"Rules: Logic and Applications" 2nd Workshop, Dec, 2019 |
Aesthetic Morphisms |
Jocelyn Ireson-Paine |
www.jocelyns-cartoons.uk/rules2019/ |
| Slides as PDF | Artistic Techniques Database Demo | Artistic Techniques Database Video | Contact |
The previous slide suggested transforming
composite images to hide transitions between
the component images included into them.
The purpose of this is to make all the
objects depicted appear part of the same
scene. The Cézannes use a different
kind of equalisation. They equalise across the
whole of each part, not only its boundary;
and the parts have not been ripped from
different contexts as
had Max Ernst's and Terry Gilliam's.
Here is Cézanne's
Mont Sainte-Victoire seen from Les Lauves:
One interpretation of this is that painting different regions in a similar style eliminates some "inessential" properties of the component objects, enabling the viewer to concentrate more on the form as a whole. Note how the form of the houses in the foreground is similar to that of the mountain in the background, even though they are at very different distances.
There can be different kinds of form equalisation. Compare Cézanne's Le Château de Médan (left) with his View of Gardanne (middle and right).
According to Peter Verdi's Cézanne, Le Château de Médan uses rhythmic parallel brushstrokes. These give the painting a superficial unity, by giving all parts of the surface a similar texture. But they also distort individual elements. But by the mid-1880s five years later, Cézanne had a more versatile technique where his strokes followed the contours of each form, but still made all forms within the image equally salient. This style didn't distort individual elements so much, so enabled him to "attend both to the formal distinctions between things and the relations among them".